ARTICLE
28 February 2019

Lincoln Caylor: Foreign Arbitral Deference Still Trending In Canadian Courts

BJ
Bennett Jones LLP

Contributor

Bennett Jones is one of Canada's premier business law firms and home to 500 lawyers and business advisors. With deep experience in complex transactions and litigation matters, the firm is well equipped to advise businesses and investors with Canadian ventures, and connect Canadian businesses and investors with opportunities around the world.
Lincoln Caylor and Ranjan Agarwal write an Expert Analysis in Law360 on "Foreign Arbitral Deference Still Trending In Canadian Courts."
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lincoln Caylor and Ranjan Agarwal write an Expert Analysis in Law360 on "Foreign Arbitral Deference Still Trending In Canadian Courts."

They look at how Canada's adoption of two jurisprudential guidelines places its courts in the position of having to grapple with how to apply the public policy exception when international arbitration awards are on the docket and awaiting enforcement.

Through federal, provincial and territorial legislation, Canada has accepted the tenets of both the New York Convention and the Model Law. The public policy exception appears in Article V of the New York Convention and in Article 34 of the Model Law.

Lincoln and Ranjan provide their insights on:

  • The test for the public policy exception
  • Successful applications of the public policy exception
  • Recent application of the public policy exception
  • Third party funding does not offend public policy in British Columbia

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More