ARTICLE
7 January 2025

Corporate Transparency Act Injunction Reinstated

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

On December 26, 2024, in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the preliminary injunction prohibiting...
United States Texas Corporate/Commercial Law
Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • within Immigration topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Environment & Waste Management and Insurance industries

On December 26, 2024, in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the preliminary injunction prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) on a nationwide basis.

In a highly unusual move, the Fifth Circuit's merits panel, which now has the appeal on an expedited basis, of its own accord lifted the stay of the injunction previously ordered by the Fifth Circuit's motions panel. In its order, the merits panel explained that "[i]n order to preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties' weighty substantive arguments, that part of the motions-panel order granting the Government's motion to stay the district court's preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and the Reporting Rule is VACATED." Briefs by the parties are due at various dates in February, and oral argument is scheduled for March 25.

As a result of this latest court ruling, reporting companies are not required to make any CTA filings pending further judicial action. This ruling is not a full and final ruling on the merits of the case, but temporarily halts enforcement of the CTA while the case proceeds.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More