ARTICLE
3 January 2024

California's Proposed 'Journalism Usage Fee' Would Tax Internet Platforms For Linked News

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 2,850 attorneys across 49 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.
California's proposed legislation, Assembly Bill (AB) 886, aimed at imposing a tax on internet platforms for their use of digital journalism content, has been delayed in the Senate...
United States California Tax

California's proposed legislation, Assembly Bill (AB) 886, aimed at imposing a tax on internet platforms for their use of digital journalism content, has been delayed in the Senate but may resurface in 2024 with potential amendments.

Key Details of AB 886

The bill would apply to internet platforms with over 50 million monthly users or annual revenues exceeding $550 billion, requiring them to pay a "journalism usage fee" to digital news providers. The fee amount would be determined through a mandatory arbitration process. AB 886 draws parallels to similar taxes in parts of the European Union, Australia, and Canada.

Industry Reaction

Large media platforms have expressed strong opposition, threatening to remove news services from California rather than comply with the tax, which they view as unfair. Search engines that rely on advertisement revenue have also raised concerns, highlighting that internet platforms substantially drive traffic to local news websites, aiding revenue generation.

Next Steps

AB 886, having already cleared the Assembly, is not bound by the Jan. 31 deadline for 2023 bills. The Senate Judiciary Committee has yet to schedule a full hearing and vote on the bill, leaving its future and potential modifications open for discussion in 2024.

ATTACHMENTS

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More