- in United States
- within Employment and HR and Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)
The past year has brought dramatic changes to the technology sector. Major companies have announced large-scale layoffs while at the same time making unprecedented investments in artificial intelligence and automation. This combination raises difficult questions. Why are companies cutting tens of thousands of jobs while simultaneously committing billions to new technologies? Part of the answer lies in efficiency, part in strategic repositioning after pandemic-era overexpansion, and part in the rapid race to lead in AI. This mix of contraction and expansion has left workers, communities, and investors trying to make sense of where the industry is headed.
While job losses are painful for those directly affected, they also mark an inflection point. Skilled professionals are entering the labor market in large numbers, and the traditional assumption that top talent is locked inside the largest corporations is no longer true. For startups and smaller firms, this environment can create opportunities, but those must be pursued with care and respect for the dislocation workers are experiencing. If approached thoughtfully, it can become a time of renewal and growth rather than decline.
The scale of workforce reductions
The numbers are striking. Crunchbase reports that more than 95,000 U.S. tech workers were laid off in 2024. Layoffs.fyi, another widely cited tracker, placed the global total at more than 150,000 workers across more than 500 companies by the end of the year.
Announcements continue in 2025. Amazon confirmed that it will cut 14,000 corporate jobs. Microsoft is reducing nearly 9,000 roles as it doubles down on its AI business. Google laid off hundreds of employees in its Android and Pixel units. Meta announced a reduction of 3,600 positions as part of its "year of efficiency."
Taken together, the numbers from 2022 through 2024 suggest that more than half a million jobs have been lost across the tech sector. Many of these are not entry-level roles but mid- and senior-level professionals with experience in scaling, managing complex projects, and working at the cutting edge of data and product development.
More than numbers: the human impact and the market reset
Behind these announcements are thousands of personal stories. Skilled engineers, designers, and managers suddenly find themselves in transition. Communities that relied on the stability of tech companies are adjusting to uncertainty. These are not abstract statistics but real disruptions in livelihoods. And yet, there is another side to the story.
Periods of contraction in one part of the market often lead to renewal in another. Workers who might never have considered opportunities outside the biggest names are now looking at smaller, fast-growing organizations. Those organizations, if ready, can benefit from talent that brings not just technical expertise but also operational insight from inside the largest firms.
This is a reset moment. For some, it will be disruptive. For others, it may be the opening that allows them to compete in ways that were previously unimaginable. Acknowledging both realities is important: optimism should not erase the hardship many continue to face.
Why this matters for startups and smaller firms
Startups are rightly described as the lifeblood of innovation. They operate closer to the ground, identify gaps in the market quickly, and build products that serve niche but growing needs. What they often lack is access to the talent that can scale their vision. Layoffs in big tech are changing that equation.
The release of talent into the marketplace creates possibilities for smaller companies to recruit professionals with skills that were once concentrated in Silicon Valley or at large multinationals. A product manager who has overseen a billion-user platform or an engineer who has scaled machine learning systems globally now might be willing to consider a role in a 50-person company. For some organizations, this may represent a meaningful step forward in capability.
Smaller firms also offer something large corporations often cannot: agility. Employees in startups typically wear multiple hats, see the direct impact of their contributions, and have a stronger voice in shaping strategy. For many workers who value autonomy and mission, this is attractive. The opportunity extends across the workforce now in transition.
Immigration as one part of the equation
From our vantage point as immigration counsel, we know that immigration frameworks remain a critical part of this story. Many of the workers affected by layoffs are foreign nationals, and their ability to remain employed depends on finding new sponsors or transitioning through existing programs. Employers who are prepared can tap into this talent using established mechanisms such as OPT, STEM OPT, H-1B transfers, O-1 extraordinary ability visas, dependent EADs, or AC21 portability provisions, to name a few.
However, immigration sponsorship is not for every company. The analogy we often share with clients is that of the roller coaster. A child who does not meet the height requirement is not ready to ride, and attempting it can have serious consequences. But if the child is well-advised and patient enough to prepare for when the moment arrives, the ride becomes a transformative experience. Similarly, a startup that is not yet ready to take on immigration sponsorship may create risks for itself and the worker. But a company that has the right infrastructure, product roadmap, and support systems in place can find sponsorship to be an exhilarating, game-changing path.
The important point is that immigration is one lever among many. For some companies it is a practical way to access talent quickly. For others, it may be a longer-term strategy. Either way, it requires preparation and honesty about readiness.
The investor dimension
None of these opportunities can be realized without capital. Even the best hires cannot thrive if the company lacks funding to sustain payroll, build infrastructure, and support the growth of its product. Investors therefore play a critical role.
At the same time, it is important to avoid the impression that worker dislocation is merely an "investor opportunity." While it is true that talent availability can lower barriers, capital should be deployed responsibly and with an eye toward building sustainable enterprises.
The timing is unusual. Talent is available at a scale that we have not seen in more than a decade. This availability lowers the barrier for startups to bring in highly qualified professionals. For investors, this means that capital deployed now can have an outsized impact. The right infusion of resources, combined with newly available talent, can create companies that define the next generation of technology.
Yet bold bets must be balanced with discipline. This is not just about pouring in money. It is about setting reasonable guardrails, tracking performance with clear metrics, and balancing the need for quick pivots with the patience that true building requires. In other words, an investor cannot keep opening the freezer door every few minutes to see if the water in the tray has turned into ice. Constant disruption slows the process. With the right mix of capital, structure, and patience, startups can grow steadily while retaining the flexibility that makes them innovative.
Investors who understand this balance are not only backing individual firms. They are shaping the innovation landscape. Funding that enables startups to bring on displaced professionals creates benefits that ripple through the economy. These are not speculative gambles but calculated responses to macroeconomic forces.
A balanced path forward
This moment should not be understood as a call to favor one category of worker over another. Layoffs are affecting American citizens, permanent residents, and foreign nationals alike. The opportunity lies in the mix. Smaller firms can benefit by building teams that combine local knowledge with global expertise, and workers can find places where they can contribute meaningfully outside the structures of the largest companies.
Employers need to be realistic about their readiness. Not every startup is prepared to manage complex hires or sponsorships. Workers need to evaluate the environments they choose, understanding both the risks and the opportunities of smaller organizations. Investors need to look beyond short-term turbulence to the long-term potential of companies willing to act decisively.
Immigration strategies, when pursued, must be part of a larger plan. Sponsorship should not be an afterthought. It should be integrated into the company's vision for growth, compliance, and culture. Only then does it become the life-changing roller coaster ride rather than a risky gamble.
Conclusion
The headlines emphasize contraction and uncertainty. Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and others are cutting thousands of roles. Entire communities are adjusting to job losses. Yet beneath the disruption is an opportunity for renewal. Skilled workers across all statuses are entering the market. Startups and smaller firms are in a position to attract them. Investors can provide the resources that allow new ideas to take root.
The convergence of these forces suggests that this is not only a time of loss but also a time of acceleration. With careful preparation and thoughtful action, startups can seize this opening, workers can find new avenues for their skills, and investors can help shape the innovations that will define the next decade.
The story of layoffs in big tech does not need to end with contraction. It can be the beginning of a broader cycle of innovation, growth, and renewal. The question is whether smaller firms, workers, and investors are prepared to meet the moment.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.