ARTICLE
10 September 2021

Potential Changes To U.S. Taxation Of A Foreign Subsidiary's Income

RB
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.

Contributor

Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren is a full-service, business-oriented law firm with offices in Milwaukee, Madison, Waukesha and Wausau, Wisconsin; Chicago and Rockford, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Denver, Colorado; and Phoenix, Arizona. With nearly 200 lawyers, the firm serves clients throughout the United States and internationally with a combination of legal advice, industry understanding and superior client service.
Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) is the income of a foreign subsidiary in excess of 10 percent of the foreign subsidiary's tangible assets. A U.S. owner pays U.S. tax...
United States Tax

Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) is the income of a foreign subsidiary in excess of 10 percent of the foreign subsidiary's tangible assets. A U.S. owner pays U.S. tax on its share of a foreign subsidiary's GILTI. The policy underlying GILTI is to deter moving intangibles abroad by taxing excess income that presumably the intangibles produce.

For example, if a foreign subsidiary earned $1.5 million and had $10 million of tangible assets, the GILTI taxed in the United States would be $500,000 ($1.5 million less 10 percent of $10 million). To avoid any excess income that would incur tax as GILTI, many U.S. parent companies, when investing in tangible assets, had their foreign subsidiaries acquire the tangible assets.

The U.S. Senate Committee on Finance introduced new draft proposals that provide for significant modifications to GILTI. Specifically, all of a foreign subsidiary's income would be subject to U.S. tax, regardless of the amount of tangible assets. If passed, the location of tangible assets will be irrelevant. In the example above, this would mean that all $1.5 million of the foreign subsidiary's income would incur U.S. tax.

U.S. parent companies should closely watch this Senate bill. If passed, the location of the newly purchased tangible assets should be determined by economic productivity, not by tax planning. Our team will continue to monitor the status of this bill and will provide updates as it moves through the Senate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More