ARTICLE
27 October 2015

BC's Franchises Act Passes Third Reading

MT
Miller Thomson LLP

Contributor

Miller Thomson LLP (“Miller Thomson”) is a national business law firm with approximately 500 lawyers across 5 provinces in Canada. The firm offers a full range of services in litigation and disputes, and provides business law expertise in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and securities, financial services, tax, restructuring and insolvency, trade, real estate, labour and employment as well as a host of other specialty areas. Clients rely on Miller Thomson lawyers to provide practical advice and exceptional value. Miller Thomson offices are located in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Saskatoon, London, Waterloo Region, Toronto, Vaughan and Montréal. For more information, visit millerthomson.com. Follow us on X and LinkedIn to read our insights on the latest legal and business developments.
Bill-38, the Franchises Act (British Columbia) was introduced in the BC Legislature on October 5, 2015 and passed its third and final reading on October 20, 2015.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
Richard Leblanc’s articles from Miller Thomson LLP are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • in Canada
  • with readers working within the Media & Information, Property and Law Firm industries

Bill-38, the Franchises Act (British Columbia) was introduced in the BC Legislature on October 5, 2015 and passed its third and final reading on October 20, 2015. The Bill will become law once it receives Royal Assent. The Bill is very similar to the franchise legislation in force in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. In addition to requiring pre-sale disclosure of the franchise opportunity to prospective franchisees, the Bill also entrenches the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing, the right of franchisees to associate without fear of franchisor recrimination, and prohibits attempts to vary choice of law or forum outside of British Columbia in respect of a franchisee's rights under the Bill. Some welcome developments in the legislation include the provision for disclosure by email, the express right of the parties to release a claim in the context of a settlement, dispute or action without offending the statute's anti-waiver provision, and clarification that a franchisee is not required to choose between rescission and a statutory claim of damages for misrepresentation or failure to comply with the Act's disclosure requirements. The small franchisee disclosure exemption for franchises of less than a year is excluded if renewals or extensions exceed a year or if renewal fees are payable. Regulations to the Bill will follow in due course.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More